Normal 0 Assume that, there is a clear causal link between the economic situation Spanair (subsumed in credit accredited SAS) and the result, see JK5022 accident in Barajas, not only is a tremendous blunder, is that it is a tremendous fallacy,
is an absurdity that gives off a disgusting smell a stale yellow journalism, with the sole intention of ending SPANAIR .... that is, say, what dark desires may nest in the overheated imagination of Birth "of the holder. can not forget to finish that SAS as their parent is obviously sick of money annually to replenish the deficit of the group companies (Spanair in this case one of them), but then to assume, assume that the accident response a crisis that is pure crap with the insane intention to sink the company. Recall once again that SAS does not have liquidity problems but requires a different group companies to improve results. Thing otherwise consistent with entrepreneurship. That improved results are achieved docking costs, certainly but this, and tengámoslo mind that a company like Spanair (at all cost) will spare no effort or money, so everything is absolutely in order on all flights. At the end of the investigating committee will determine the causes of the accident, several, you can start looking now, and you can determine what hasty, shameful holders against Spanair discharges. Perhaps it has no cure. Spanair will be just a bad memory for some tabloid media slime. So much of the world and its owners. Santiago Cardona
